For Consultants & Advisory Firms

Turn a messy client brief into a board-ready memo in 20 minutes.

NeuroAgent runs a structured council of 16 specialist AI agents on your client's decision — strategy, risk, finance, competitive, contrarian — then delivers a fully structured strategy brief you can refine and present.

5 free council runs · No credit card · Cancel anytime

By the numbers — third-party data
73.4%
Consulting on-time delivery rate in 2024, down from 80.2% in 2022
Consulting industry benchmark, 2024
68.9%
Average billable utilization — below the 75% healthy threshold
Strategy consulting industry report, 2024
9.8%
Average EBITDA in 2024, down from 16.1% in 2022
Consulting profitability benchmark, 2024
20 min
From brief to first-draft memo
5–6 hrs
Saved per deliverable
3×
More clients per consultant per month
The consulting bottleneck

The work that slows you down is the work that pays the least

First-draft synthesis consumes the time that should go into client insight

4–6 hours of analytical production work per engagement before a single client-specific observation is made. With billable utilization at 68.9% — below the 75% sustainable threshold — non-billable synthesis is the primary margin drain in most consulting teams.

Delivery quality varies by who's on the project — and clients notice

On-time delivery has fallen from 80.2% in 2022 to 73.4% in 2024. Senior partners produce sharper analysis; junior consultants miss key risks. Quality varies by team composition, not by methodology — and the gap compounds when multiple engagements run simultaneously.

EBITDA can't recover without breaking the headcount model

Average consulting EBITDA has dropped from 16.1% to 9.8% since 2022. More engagements means more consultants. The bottleneck — analytical throughput per billable hour — never improves without changing the production model. Revenue grows linearly with headcount.

Before vs after

The same deliverable, a different process

Without NeuroAgent
✕4–6 hours of synthesis and writing
✕Analysis quality varies by consultant seniority
✕Key risks often surface after client presentation
✕Rewrite rounds after partner review
✕No documented rationale if client pushes back
✕Junior staff bottleneck on busy periods
With NeuroAgent
First-draft memo in 20 minutes
Consistent analysis across every engagement
Risks and blind spots surfaced during deliberation
Fewer revision rounds — structured output from the start
Full reasoning trail included in the brief
Scale capacity without adding headcount
Example output

What a council brief looks like

Anonymised excerpt from a real market entry brief generated for a boutique strategy firm. Input: a 3-paragraph client brief. Time: 18 minutes.

council-brief-market-entry.pdf
Decision under review

Should [Client Co.] enter the German B2B SaaS market in Q3 2026 or delay 12 months?

Council recommendation

Delay entry by 9 months. Current ARR runway does not support the €280–320K cost of compliant market entry alongside the Q3 product release. Recommend a structured pre-entry program: 2 anchor customer LOIs, one German distribution partner, and a GDPR-compliant data infrastructure before committing capital.

Agent deliberation summary
Strategist

Opportunity is real but timing is wrong. German SMB SaaS spending is growing at 18% YoY. Entry in 9–12 months after establishing a local reference customer would be materially stronger.

Risk Guardian

Critical: GDPR compliance, local data residency, and German-language support are procurement requirements, not differentiators. Estimated compliance gap: 14 weeks. Do not enter without resolving.

Financial Analyst

At current burn rate, Q3 entry compresses runway to 6.2 months. Post-entry CAC in DACH is typically 2.3× UK equivalent. Payback period extends to 18+ months. Delay preserves optionality.

Contrarian

Minority position: the competitive window may close if two identified competitors enter before Q4. Consider a low-cost pre-entry: one dedicated BD hire in Munich on 6-month contract, budget €85K.

Key risks identified
GDPR / data residency compliance gap — est. 14 weeks to resolve
No German-language support capability in current team
Runway compression creates fundraising pressure mid-entry
Implementation roadmap

Week 1–4: Identify and approach 3 target anchor customers via LinkedIn and existing network. Negotiate LOI with pricing at €12–18K ACV. Simultaneously commission GDPR compliance audit...

How it works

Three steps from client brief to deliverable

01

Paste your client brief

Drop in the client's context, the decision they're facing, the constraints, and any background data. No formatting required.

02

16 specialist agents deliberate

Your council runs a structured analysis — strategy, financial, risk, competitive, operational, and a contrarian voice that stress-tests the emerging recommendation.

03

Download a board-ready memo

Receive a fully structured strategy brief: recommendation, supporting rationale, key risks, trade-off analysis, dissenting views, and implementation steps.

Pricing for consulting teams

One good brief pays for a year

At €499/month, the Business plan gives your team 50 council runs and 10 seats. If you save 5 hours per brief at a €150/hr billing rate, you recover the cost in a single deliverable.

Teams
€149/mo
3 seats · 20 runs/month
Best for: Solo consultants & small practices
20 council runs / month
All agent types
PDF export
Decision history
Business
€499/mo
10 seats · 50 runs/month
Best for: Boutique advisory firms
50 council runs / month
All agent types
AI Delivery Engine
Team collaboration
Integrations Hub
Scale
€1,490/mo
30 seats · unlimited runs
Best for: Mid-size consulting firms
Unlimited council runs
API access
Custom agents
Priority support
Private data handling
Full pricing details
Common questions

Questions consultants ask first

Is this just another AI writing assistant?
No. Writing assistants help you draft faster — they don't analyze your client's decision. NeuroAgent runs a multi-agent council: a strategist, a risk analyst, a financial evaluator, a contrarian, and others all deliberate on your specific client scenario before producing output. The result is a stress-tested recommendation, not a polished draft of whatever you already thought.
How is this different from using ChatGPT or Claude?
A single AI model gives you one perspective, shaped by how you phrased the question. NeuroAgent structures the deliberation: each agent evaluates the decision independently from their specialist lens, then they debate across multiple rounds. The memo includes dissenting views, identified risks, and trade-off reasoning — not just a confident single answer. For a paying client, that difference is visible in the output.
Can I trust the output quality with real client scenarios?
NeuroAgent is designed for professional use. The structured output includes explicit confidence levels, identified assumptions, and flagged uncertainties — so you review and refine rather than pass through uncritically. Most consultants find the first-draft quality is at or above what a strong senior analyst produces, which means your editing effort drops sharply rather than disappearing entirely.
What types of consulting work is this best suited to?
NeuroAgent performs strongest on strategy, GTM, organizational, and investment-type decisions: market entry, product strategy, pricing, M&A diligence, restructuring, and competitive positioning. It's less suited to highly quantitative modeling work that requires live data integration.
Is my client data kept confidential?
Yes. NeuroAgent does not use your session content to train models. Business and Scale plans include private data handling. Enterprise plans support private cloud deployment, SSO/SAML, and audit logs for full data sovereignty.
How many client briefs can I run per month?
The Teams plan (€149/month) includes 20 council runs across 3 seats. The Business plan (€499/month) gives 50 runs across 10 seats — enough for a small consulting team running several client engagements simultaneously. Scale and Enterprise plans support unlimited runs.
Start today

Your next client brief could take 20 minutes.

Run your first council session free — no card required. See the output quality before committing to anything.

5 free runs · No setup · Results in under 20 minutes

What to bring, what happens, and what to review

Who this is for: Consultants. Use the workflow when a choice needs explicit trade-offs and a record your stakeholders can review.

Required inputs: Client objectives, scope, supporting evidence, stakeholder disagreements, and the deliverable the client must review. Separate facts from estimates. Identify a human decision owner and redact confidential information you are not authorized to share.

Workflow: Define the brief, review the council's analysis and challenges, inspect the recommendation, and decide what to accept or revise. Execution and delivery features depend on your plan; external CRM syncing is not part of this workflow.

What you receive: A council deliberation and a documented recommendation to review. Check that the final brief reflects your options, trade-offs, risks, dissent, and next steps rather than assuming every generated claim is correct.

Limitations: AI may miss evidence or invent facts. Personas can share models and assumptions; their agreement does not establish independence or accuracy. Model confidence scores are not calibrated business forecasts. A qualified person must review legal, financial, regulated, and irreversible choices.

Relevant example: Use the complete fictional decision brief to see how assumptions, dissent, uncertainty, and named next steps fit together. It is not a customer outcome or a benchmark.

Try a non-sensitive decision brief to explore the experience, or request a demo and the team will follow up. Check current plans and limits before committing.